Results 1 to 5 of 5
I saw this sticky (The "Should You Choose 32-bit or 64-bit Linux", I'm not allowed to hyperlink yet ), and saw it's been a year since the last update. Does ...
- 10-07-2009 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2
32 vs 64 bit
I saw this sticky (The "Should You Choose 32-bit or 64-bit Linux", I'm not allowed to hyperlink yet
), and saw it's been a year since the last update. Does it still apply now?
- 10-07-2009 #2forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 17,779
There's a recent poll about this in the Coffee Lounge:
http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/cof...vs-64-bit.html
Personally, I can't see myself ever returning to 32-bit Linux.oz
→ new users: read this first
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
- 10-08-2009 #3
Thanks for reminding me about that thread. Yes, my recommendations are still valid. With one recent exception (Ubuntu 9.04) I'd say that the performance you get out of 64-bit versions of Linux is still equal to that of 32-bit. There are no tangible advantages in that regard, but at the same time you shouldn't have any more problems using 64-bit over 32-bit.
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 10-08-2009 #4Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 8,485
64bit is appropriate if you are going to need more that 3-4 GB of RAM (real or virtual), or if you want to run 64bit clients in virtual machines. I have been running 64bit CentOS (RHEL) 5 for going on 2 years now and have had no problems with it. It will happily run 32bit software as well.
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 10-31-2009 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Bedok Reservoir Road, Singapore
- Posts
- 15
I have been installing 64-bit distros without encountering any problems. They are very stable now.


Reply With Quote
