Results 1 to 10 of 12
On my last install I put
Drive one
windows on the first partion
created a swap partition
linux on the third partion
Drive two
Linux on the first partiton
Grub ...
- 10-24-2010 #1
Partitions do not match the way I configured them at install.
On my last install I put
Drive one
windows on the first partion
created a swap partition
linux on the third partion
Drive two
Linux on the first partiton
Grub found an old windows and made a menu for it
So why does sfdisk -l return this?
Code:Disk /dev/hda: 19457 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls #blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 0+ 2549 2550- 20482843+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda2 2550 10388 7839 62966767+ 5 Extended /dev/hda3 0 - 0 0 0 Empty /dev/hda4 0 - 0 0 0 Empty /dev/hda5 2550+ 2740 191- 1534176 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda6 2741+ 10388 7648- 61432528+ 83 Linux Disk /dev/sda: 60801 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls #blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 0+ 190 191- 1534176 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda2 191 7838 7648 61432560 5 Extended /dev/sda3 0 - 0 0 0 Empty /dev/sda4 0 - 0 0 0 Empty /dev/sda5 191+ 7838 7648- 61432528+ 83 Linux [root@localhost kbs]#
This is the Map FileCode:timeout 10 color black/cyan yellow/cyan gfxmenu (hd0,5)/boot/gfxmenu default 0 title linux kernel (hd0,5)/boot/vmlinuz BOOT_IMAGE=linux root=/dev/hda6 resume=/dev/hda5 splash=silent vga=788 initrd (hd0,5)/boot/initrd.img title linux-nonfb kernel (hd0,5)/boot/vmlinuz BOOT_IMAGE=linux-nonfb root=/dev/hda6 resume=/dev/hda5 initrd (hd0,5)/boot/initrd.img title failsafe kernel (hd0,5)/boot/vmlinuz BOOT_IMAGE=failsafe root=/dev/hda6 failsafe initrd (hd0,5)/boot/initrd.img title windows root (hd0,0) makeactive chainloader +1 title windows1 root (hd2,0) map (0x80) (0x82) map (0x82) (0x80) makeactive chainloader +1
Code:(hd0) /dev/hda (hd1) /dev/sda
Thanks in advance !Last edited by MikeTbob; 10-24-2010 at 08:18 PM. Reason: Added code tags
- 10-24-2010 #2Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Ft. Polk, LA
- Posts
- 796
What's the issue? Your partition layout is exactly what you described.
The only thing is that I don't see where grub is finding the second Windows partition.
- 10-24-2010 #3
It is probably my own ignorance.
For one I have no idea how there be can be partions that I install an O.S on and what is the mount command for fstab mounting? Are they not both partitions? Every time My thumb drive mounts it would create a new partition would it not.
I installed Linux after Windows and swap so Linux should be hda3 and it is hda5. Grub actually has it as hda6 if converted to Hard drive talk.
I was trying to figure out problems I was having with grub booting which has made me investigate the inconsistancies of what I know and what I assume I know about it.\
Thanks for your experitise!
- 10-24-2010 #4
You have extended partitions. That changes the way the partitions are numbered and mounted.
- 10-24-2010 #5I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.
- 10-24-2010 #6
You wouldn't create extended partitions inside extended partitions, those are logical partitions. It's not unusual to have multiple logical partitions inside and extended partition, that's why you use an extended partition in the first place. I'm not sure why there are extended partitions in the first place, but they are there, one on each drive. They may have already been there before the installation started, and that's why the logical partitions are there. Apparently the installer just picked one.
- 10-24-2010 #7
I thounght you can create 4 partitions without an extended one.
Partition 1 Windows
Partition 2 Swap
Partition 3 Linux
I should be able to create at least another partition without it being extended but I must not understant it correctly. If I go over 4 than the forth one is extended and is broken up in to logical volumes.
Could someone explain the partition rules?
I'm thinking that the partitioner in the Distro installers don't work as assumed.Last edited by theKbStockpiler; 10-24-2010 at 10:55 PM.
- 10-24-2010 #8
I think the extended and logical partitions were there before you started the Ubuntu install. There is an extended partition on both drives. You can remove the logical partitions, then the extended partition, and create primary partitions for Linux and swap if you like. That will require reinstalling Ubuntu, but you can do it if you want. The logical partitions aren't really hurting anything, but you can remove just the two empty ones on each drive if you like. I don't know who set them up that way, but I don't think the Ubuntu installer did it, unless you told it to. My suspicion, as I said, is that they were already there from a previous partitioning.
- 10-25-2010 #9
I used a Ubuntu 7.10 live Disk to come up with the followling.
I'm a RedHat imitator type but I like all the utilities in one place. Anyways this is a screen shot of the installer application if you edit your installs partition manually.
The GUI diagram is exactly like I intended but the out come is quite different. The installer has the drives and partitions one way in the diagram and another in the chart part. I think it is part of the installation program myself. I think it is intentional. I wiped out both drives with the windows installer and did the same with the linux ones and it made no difference. I used Mandriva 08 last on the first drive and Mandriva 10 on the second with similar results. I though that this was my Grub problem but it really is not.
Thanks for all the great replies and if you have something to add please do so!
- 10-26-2010 #10
Well, I don't know what to tell you. I can't see how you got there or what you did. All I can say is that I've installed every major distro multiple times, and I've never seen an installer put extended partitions on a drive without being told to do it. That's a new one on me.


Reply With Quote
