Results 1 to 4 of 4
So I read the gpl, and I love the free software ideaology. But I also noticed that developers are encouraged to charge money for their software under the liscense. If ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 01-11-2013 #1
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
GNU GPL question
- 01-12-2013 #2"I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"
- 01-13-2013 #3
- Join Date
- May 2004
- arch linux
Hello and welcome aboard!
I think most of the vendors that try to profit from LInux products attempt to do so by offering tech support for a fee rather than trying to sell the distribution itself. Some vendors do sell various distributions on disks or flash drives, but those fees are generally designed to recover the costs of any blank disks or drives, and any postage & handling. There is always a chance of someone else selling the same distro on CD/DVD disks or flash drives for a lesser price.oz
- 01-13-2013 #4
Welcome to LinuxForums!
To give an example on what oz said, take a look at RHEL and CentOS.
They are the same system, but CentOS removes the Red Hat logos and branding. You can install either OS and get the exact same result.
But there's one major difference... RHEL requires a paid subscription for tech support and access to the RH software repos. The software is of course freely available from other sources, in source code and pre-compiled binary format. But having a dedicated support line that you can call should something go wrong in your production environment may justify the subscription fee.