Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Hi, I'm new..just registered yesterday. I have tried a lot of livecd distros and some were actually better than others. The very last were Fedora Core 6 and Ubuntu 6.10 ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1

    Question Get 'em anyways?

    Hi, I'm new..just registered yesterday.

    I have tried a lot of livecd distros and some were actually better than others. The very last were Fedora Core 6 and Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy). I was not that impressed with neither..Fedora was very clean (cool) but slow, Ubuntu stopped responding after having 5/6 programs running and I was actually sad about it.

    I'm trying to find a fast (at the same time stable) distro..something I could boot instead of (or with) windows. I've searched a bit and all I could find was Archlinux and Slack - now my question is if I install Arch (since I wasn't able to find a livecd) how would I be able to install apps, the same way Ubuntu does?

    In Ubuntu I just sudo and other code in terminal and there I'd had apps installed..But in Arch it seems a bit different. It's not laziness, but just the fact that a lot of apps are already packed for Ubuntu and I have little time to spend at home.

    Thanks,
    Limited

  2. #2
    Linux Engineer rong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    803
    Welcome to the forum.

    Quote Originally Posted by Limited
    Hi, I'm new..just registered yesterday.
    I'm trying to find a fast (at the same time stable) distro..something I could boot instead of (or with) windows. I've searched a bit and all I could find was Archlinux and Slack - now my question is if I install Arch (since I wasn't able to find a livecd) how would I be able to install apps, the same way Ubuntu does?
    Arch uses it's own variation of a package manager called pacman. The main issue for you is to know that Arch is a fairly big build project. If you read their installation documentation you can judge for yourself if it's really what you are looking for. If you don't have a lot of time it's not for you.

    I suggest you not get into the "which distro is best" type of questions or this thread will get closed in a hurry. However asking specific questions about a specific distro is fine as long as you've done some quality research first.

    There are several sticky posts here covering the topic of which is best. Check them out for some good suggestions on the subject.
    registered Linux user #388382

    Have you checked here first?

  3. #3
    Linux User netstrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    474
    I'd say you should not judge the distros yet before you have installed them it might be that Ubuntu works fine for you on HDD..try dual-booting some of them alongside Windows.

  4. #4
    Trusted Penguin Cabhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA, USA
    Posts
    3,230
    You should be aware that no LiveCD will run as fast as a distro installed to your HD. If, for instance, you enjoyed Ubuntu, try installing it alongside Windows, and see if it works for you. It's very easy to install and replace Linux distros, so there's no reason to avoid doing so.
    DISTRO=Arch
    Registered Linux User #388732

  5. #5
    Just Joined! tuxv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    Posts
    92
    You might wnat to try Debian, Ubuntu is a variant from Debian. And Debian is Stable and much more faster than Ubuntu.

    And you might be interested in Vector Linux too, It's fast and stable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...