Welcome to Linux Forums! With a comprehensive Linux Forum, information on various types of Linux software and many Linux Reviews articles, we have all the knowledge you need a click away, or accessible via our knowledgeable members.
I was originally running two separate installs of Vista, deleted the first one and replaced it with Linux Mint yesterday. Vista did not appear in the grub loader at start-up, and I haven't been able to boot from it by adding it to the menu.lst
Here's my sudo fdisk -l
Code:
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x06f506f5
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 9258 74364853+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 9259 19457 81923467+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/sda5 9624 19439 78846988+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda6 9259 9623 2931799+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda7 19440 19457 144553+ 83 Linux
Partition table entries are not in disk order
As for actual partition order, it went like this from start to end:
Linux Mint
3gb swap
Vista
144mb ext3 at end
What I've tried so far is to add the following to my menu.lst:
Code:
title Windows Vista 64
rootnoverify (hd0,1)
savedefault
makeactive
chainloader +1
and tried hd0,1 through hd0,9 and all returned "invalid device requested"
The format for hdx,x is drive, partition right?
Not sure where to go from here. If I remove linux mint I'll still have to make a new mbr so that Vista will load right?
Location: 3rd rock from sun - Often seen near moon
Posts: 1,252
Code:
and tried hd0,1 through hd0,9 and all returned "invalid device requested"
Is (hd0,4) not working??
Quote:
title Windows Vista 64
rootnoverify (hd0,4)
savedefault
makeactive
chainloader +1
__________________
- Lakshmipathi.G
-------------------
FOSS India Award winning ext3fs Undelete tool and tutorials www.giis.co.in
First they criticize you,Then they laugh at you,Then they fight with you,Then you win. - M.K.Gandhi
-------------------
Somehow I had the second Vista installed as a logical partition. Not sure how that came about as I wouldn't have been able to boot from it before the linux install if that was the case right? Perhaps deleting and reformatting the first vista partition to use for Linux caused it?
Somehow I had the second Vista installed as a logical partition. Not sure how that came about as I wouldn't have been able to boot from it before the linux install if that was the case right? Perhaps deleting and reformatting the first vista partition to use for Linux caused it?
Vista installed in Primary partition was main OS in Vista/Vista dual boot setup. You have removed that and all files necessary to boot second Vista are gone now. Its not possible to boot up Vista installed in Logical Partition now. You can back data from it easily.
__________________
It takes a lot of time to be a genius, you have to sit around so much doing nothing, really doing nothing. - Gertrude Stein New Users:Read This First
A Newbie's Getting Started Guide to Linux
Learn the basics of the Linux operating systems. Get to know what it is all about, and familiarize yourself with the practical side. Basically, if you're a complete Linux newbie and looking for a quick and easy guide to get you started this is it. subscribe
Open Source Security Myths Dispelled Dispel the five major myths surrounding Open Source Security and gain the tools necessary to make a truly informed decision for your IT organization subscribe
InformationWeek InformationWeek is the only newsweekly you'll need to stay on top of the latest developments in information technology. subscribe