Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15
Originally Posted by reed9 The problem with Gentoo is that compiling software will take forever on such a low spec machine. Amen brother! It would take days just to get ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #11
    Administrator MikeTbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,864

    Quote Originally Posted by reed9 View Post
    The problem with Gentoo is that compiling software will take forever on such a low spec machine.
    Amen brother!
    It would take days just to get Gcc or Python to compile and I really do mean days.
    I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
    All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.

    I'd rather be lost at the lake than found at home.

  2. #12
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    16
    Well, just tested Slax, Gentoo minimal, TinyCore and INX. All of them get kernel panic and don't start, with what looks like the same message on each.

    I modified the Slax disk with their online module system, removing KDE and X, so it wasn't as bloated. It came up with a nice-looking boot-selection screen, but when I chose "console" (or similar) it got a kernel panic fairly soon in the boot process.

    INX was similar, it uncompressed the kernel, started showing messages, then aborted with "Kernel panic! Not syncing - attempted to kill the idle process". From memory, this (and output before it) is the same message that Knoppix and Slax got.

    Gentoo also had kernel panic, and so did TinyCore, although it was lot less verbose.

    I think I might just install a neutered DSL, it works even if it is a bit inelegant.
    Thanks everyone for the advice.

  3. #13
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1
    I'm having a similar problem... thought i might add though that the debian 5.05 netinstall worked for me (P166 64M RAM). Though DSL has a smaller footprint, guess it depends what you are trying to do. I also tried slitaz low ram, which didn't work.

    Good luck to all dinosaur users

  4. #14
    Linux Guru rokytnji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    4,116
    For .486 machines. No X. 2.6 Kernel. May be right up your alley.

    antiX-forum • View topic - antiX-core-486-a1.iso available for testing.

    and a post/thread from one member below

    antiX-forum • View topic - antiX-core-486-a1 on really old hardware

    antiX-forum • View topic - antix-m8.5-486 on old hardware

    The OP was even trying to run Icewm on a P1 with 64 mb of ram.

    You will want the

    # antiX-core-486-b1.iso
    # antiX-core-486-b1.iso.md5sum
    From

    Index of /antix/Testing
    Linux Registered User # 475019
    Lead,Follow, or get the heck out of the way. I Have a Masters in Raising Hell
    Tech Books
    Free Linux Books
    Newbie Guide
    Courses at Home

  5. #15
    Linux Engineer Segfault's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Acadiana
    Posts
    877
    Nowadays is almost impossible to find a precompiled kernel that runs on less than i686. For GCC the first i686 was Pentium Pro. For anything less (Pentium, 486) you need to find right distro or compile it yourself, using a framework as Gentoo. Build will be slow, but possible, using distcc in pump mode.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •