Welcome to Linux Forums!

With a comprehensive Linux Forum, information on various types of Linux software and many Linux Reviews articles, we have all the knowledge you need a click away, or accessible via our knowledgeable members.

Linux Forum ArticlesLinux ForumsLinux Forum DownloadsLinux Hosts
Home|Register|FAQ|Member List|Calendar|Unanswered Posts|Forum Rules|Today's Posts|Advanced Search|
SEARCH FOR IN
Go Back   Linux Forums > GNU Linux Zone > Peripherals / Hardware
Reload this Page [SOLVED] AMD Athlon XP driver
Linux Forums
Linux Forums
Welcome To The Linux Forums!
Welcome to Linux Forums. We pride ourselves in being one of the largest Linux communities on the web, we encourage you to REGISTER on our forums and participate in the community. There are over 150,000 members ready to answer your questions. JOINING US today will allow you to make new posts, get support, send messages to other members and submit downloads to our downloads directory and many other great features!

Peripherals / Hardware Is your hardware supported? Having trouble getting some hardware working? Post here!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2008   #11 (permalink)
NicholasNCE
Just Joined!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Here is a photo of my processor's identification tag. It uses a 754 socket

Attached Images
File Type: jpg Processor detail.jpg (37.0 KB, 5 views)
NicholasNCE is offline  
Old 05-31-2008   #12 (permalink)
i92guboj
Linux Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Córdoba (Spain)
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by HROAdmin26 View Post
Sorry, the "Model 8" PDF is not this CPU. I didn't post the AMD docs without reading them. As an EE, I used to write and read these docs. AMD doesn't "forget" to update their tech docs when they release a new CPU. I am sure if we dig up the XP-M or Sempron Mobile tech docs, we'll find the exact specs.

What is annoying is that AMD's PR machine labeled these as Athlon XP-M (AKA Mobile Sempron), but the underlying "core identifier" just references "Athlon XP." It's the only "3000" series with 256K cache and the freq rating matches at 1600. The fact that the CPU is scaled way back to 800MHz for mobile use also makes sense, as a desktop CPU (from 4-5 years ago) wouldn't freq scale at all, let alone going from 2.167Ghz => 800 MHz (2.167 being the desktop XP 3000 speed.) My point simply being that none of the CPU's listed in the model 8 doc match the characteristics/properties of this chip.

But, once the XP-M is taken into account, the CPU frequency and scaling matches up and the 800MHz being seen *makes sense.*

As is commonly done, you have the same "core" changed/reworked for another purpose. In this case, a mobile chip with a *much* higher FSB (333 vs 800MHz Hypertransport) vs. the earlier version (different voltages, pinout, etc.)
I see. Now it makes much more sense. Thanks
i92guboj is offline  
Old 06-04-2008   #13 (permalink)
NicholasNCE
Just Joined!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Does anyone have an idea on how I can solve this problem???
Any help will be appreciated.
NicholasNCE is offline  
Old 06-04-2008   #14 (permalink)
a12ctic
Linux User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 464
Look through the bios and turn off any power saving features.
a12ctic is offline  
Old 06-04-2008   #15 (permalink)
HROAdmin26
Linux User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 488
You don't have a problem. The CPU changes speed "as needed." When on battery, it may always run at 800MHz (to conserve power.) While plugged into AC, it likely changes speeds depending on the load. As mentioned, there may be some BIOS settings that affect this behavior, but having the CPU running at 1.6GHz while on battery may mean the battery life is significantly reduced.

If you want details, look up the technical docs for your Athlon XP-M (Mobile Sempron) and/or your laptop.

* Notice in the example I posted that the Intel E6750 2.66GHz is "listed" at 2GHz (and this is a desktop machine on AC.) It's running at a lower speed because there is no load.
HROAdmin26 is offline  
Old 06-04-2008   #16 (permalink)
NicholasNCE
Just Joined!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Thank-you very much for your help.

I think this topic can be closed now.
NicholasNCE is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 PM.




© 2000 - 2008 - All Rights Reserved - Property of  MAS Media

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0