Results 1 to 6 of 6
Hi,
I want to the differences between mutex and semaphore.
As i know differences are,
1.Mutex needs to be initialized but semaphore need not be.
2.semaphores will be alive even ...
- 12-04-2011 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 5
Difference between mutex and semaphore
Hi,
I want to the differences between mutex and semaphore.
As i know differences are,
1.Mutex needs to be initialized but semaphore need not be.
2.semaphores will be alive even if the process dies where as mutex dies with the scope where it was declared.
3. mutex can have recurcive lock but semaphores cant.
are these valid ? if not what are the actual differences
- 12-04-2011 #2Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 5
Mutex:
Is a key to a toilet. One person can have the key - occupy the toilet - at the time. When finished, the person gives (frees) the key to the next person in the queue.
Officially: "Mutexes are typically used to serialise access to a section of re-entrant code that cannot be executed concurrently by more than one thread. A mutex object only allows one thread into a controlled section, forcing other threads which attempt to gain access to that section to wait until the first thread has exited from that section."
Ref: Symbian Developer Library
(A mutex is really a semaphore with value 1.)
emaphore:
Is the number of free identical toilet keys. Example, say we have four toilets with identical locks and keys. The semaphore count - the count of keys - is set to 4 at beginning (all four toilets are free), then the count value is decremented as people are coming in. If all toilets are full, ie. there are no free keys left, the semaphore count is 0. Now, when eq. one person leaves the toilet, semaphore is increased to 1 (one free key), and given to the next person in the queue.
Officially: "A semaphore restricts the number of simultaneous users of a shared resource up to a maximum number. Threads can request access to the resource (decrementing the semaphore), and can signal that they have finished using the resource (incrementing the semaphore)."
Ref: Symbian Developer Library
- 12-04-2011 #3
I think Verity Stob explains this quite well.
Can't tell an OS by it's GUI
- 12-04-2011 #4Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 8,974
I think xerophyte80 has made a very concise explanation of the differences between a mutex and semaphore. Excellent!
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 12-06-2011 #5
xerophyte, I must award you my kudos. That's possibly the best explanation I've ever seen of the mutex/semaphore difference.
DISTRO=Arch
Registered Linux User #388732
- 12-06-2011 #6
I didn't even know I was looking for an answer to this, but what an answer I found. xerophyte, are you by any chance a teacher?
If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.


2Likes
Reply With Quote