Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Ok, so I have an Acer Aspire 5100 and I got it from my sis with 1gb of memory. Went out today and upgraded it to 4gb (total capacity) and ...
  1. #1
    Linux Newbie cybersmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    122

    Exclamation Not seeing 1.8gb of Memory

    Ok, so I have an Acer Aspire 5100 and I got it from my sis with 1gb of memory. Went out today and upgraded it to 4gb (total capacity) and after having several failed attempts at startup my laptop finally spun to life and is only registering 2.2gb of memory. Is there something in Linux that limits this?

    So my failed startup was the system getting past the loading screen and then freezing with a black screen and the mouse as a bog block and nothing moving.

    Any help would be appreciated.
    The problem with developing something completely foolproof is underestimating the complete ingenuity of fools ~Unknown

  2. #2
    Super Moderator MikeTbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,144
    Are you sure this machine supports 4GB of RAM?
    I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
    All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.

  3. #3
    Linux Newbie cybersmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    122
    AcerPanAm.com/us

    Yes I checked that before I upgraded it.
    The problem with developing something completely foolproof is underestimating the complete ingenuity of fools ~Unknown

  4. #4
    Linux Engineer b2bwild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Behind You!
    Posts
    1,108
    So you a single DIMM of 4 GB?
    Never make any misteaks.

    Read my Blog at --> Penguin Inside Subscribe Feed

  5. #5
    Linux Newbie cybersmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    122

    Memory

    No, I have 2x 2GB SODIMM chips
    The problem with developing something completely foolproof is underestimating the complete ingenuity of fools ~Unknown

  6. #6
    Super Moderator MikeTbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,144
    Does the BIOS see all 4 GB?
    Check these threads.
    Ubuntu 4GB Ram Limitation and Solution
    Feature: High Memory In The Linux Kernel | KernelTrap
    PAE kernel seems to be the answer, but I haven't done in-depth study yet either.
    I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
    All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.

  7. #7
    Linux Newbie cybersmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    122
    Yes, I posted the mem scan on LinuxQuestions.org, and they are telling me the BIOS sees it, but Linux does not, I can post the info here I posted there, wait 1...

    Code:
    Linux version 2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.i686 (mockbuild@x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.co
    m) (gcc version 4.3.2 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Feb 11 23:58
    :12 EST 2009
    BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
     BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009dc00 (usable)
     BIOS-e820: 000000000009dc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
     BIOS-e820: 00000000000d0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
     BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000008fe90000 (usable)
     BIOS-e820: 000000008fe90000 - 000000008fe9a000 (ACPI data)
     BIOS-e820: 000000008fe9a000 - 000000008ff00000 (ACPI NVS)
     BIOS-e820: 000000008ff00000 - 00000000a0000000 (reserved)
     BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved)
     BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved)
     BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
     BIOS-e820: 00000000fff80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
     BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000160000000 (usable)
    DMI present.
    last_pfn = 0x8fe90 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000
    x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
    kernel direct mapping tables up to 38000000 @ 7000-c000
    Using x86 segment limits to approximate NX protection
    They told me all this mumbo jumbo is reading right for the BIOS
    The problem with developing something completely foolproof is underestimating the complete ingenuity of fools ~Unknown

  8. #8
    Super Moderator MikeTbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,144
    Heh, it's just mombo jumbo to me too.
    Do a little more research on PAE kernels.
    I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
    All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.

  9. #9
    Linux Newbie cybersmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    122
    Fedora 10 memory usage - Page 2 - LinuxQuestions.org

    Apparently somebody else was having the same issue. I looked into upgrading my system to x64 and it looked to be a little iffy. I realy don't want to have to do everything over again. I just spent the past 5 days solid tweaking my system out just the way I want it.
    The problem with developing something completely foolproof is underestimating the complete ingenuity of fools ~Unknown

  10. #10
    Super Moderator MikeTbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,144
    I could be mistaken, but you might be able to just install a PAE kernel and be done with it. Keep in mind though, this is just a guess and not first hand knowledge. The PAE kernel is for more than 4GB, I'm not too sure it'll work either. Perhaps you should try a LiveCD such knoppix and see if it has any issues with your RAM.
    I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
    All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...