Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Hi, i've a redhat linux 9 upadated by redhat from 7 version to 9 version. A couple of days ago i was a problem with my mail, in other words ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3

    Question Mail Problem. DNS problem?

    Hi,

    i've a redhat linux 9 upadated by redhat from 7 version to 9 version. A couple of days ago i was a problem with my mail, in other words i'm not able to get any email nor to send any email. I've a proxy configuration and i tried to set iptables in order to verify the port. The 110,255 and 995 ports are opened but the mails on the client stations doesn't work. The mails works only on the server station in eth1 but it doesn't work in eth0. Therefore,i tried to verify name sever and it is incomplete, probably the automatic update raised the problem. Furthermore, i tried to pinging the host name (e.g. pop.gmail.com, domainame, ecc...) but it failed,the same thinks with the telnet command, the message was impossible to connect to the hostname or domainame.

    I believe that it could be a dns problem because it could not be able to link the IP with the hosts. Someone could ask to me why the http links work, so i believe that the optenet service is able to fix this problem,but only against http links.
    I tried to restart named but it refused to stop it, Could it be a named problem the cause? Can i reconfig it with bind 9?

    Any idea? what do you think?

    pintalgi

  2. #2
    Linux Guru Lazydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Keystone State
    Posts
    2,281
    Are you running a dns caching server or a full dns server?

    Look at the output from the following command;

    Code:
    service named status
    If you don't see 'named is running' then issue;

    Code:
    service named start

    Regards
    Robert

    Linux
    The adventure of a life time.

    Linux User #296285
    Get Counted

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3
    thank you very much Lazydog, but I've worked the DNS problem out. I have acted as follow:

    1. I've opened the 53 port on iptables

    2. I've settled the DHCP script, which was static therefore it stopped the dns changing.

    3. i've rewritten the named.conf because named didn't take on anything from resolv.conf, therefore the new dns in resolv was not got by named.

  4. #4
    Linux Engineer Segfault's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Acadiana
    Posts
    855
    May I say something? ... Thank you, here we go:

    Please get rid of RH-9. It is an ancient distribution, it hasn't had security updates for long, long time. Using insecure operating systems poses risk to the whole internet.

  5. #5
    Linux Guru Lazydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Keystone State
    Posts
    2,281
    Quote Originally Posted by Segfault View Post
    May I say something? ... Thank you, here we go:

    Please get rid of RH-9. It is an ancient distribution, it hasn't had security updates for long, long time. Using insecure operating systems poses risk to the whole internet.
    Yes, RH9 is not worth it to run anymore because it is no longer updated.

    Quote Originally Posted by pintalgi View Post
    thank you very much Lazydog, but I've worked the DNS problem out. I have acted as follow:

    1. I've opened the 53 port on iptables

    2. I've settled the DHCP script, which was static therefore it stopped the dns changing.

    3. i've rewritten the named.conf because named didn't take on anything from resolv.conf, therefore the new dns in resolv was not got by named.
    named.conf does not use resolv.conf for anything.

    Regards
    Robert

    Linux
    The adventure of a life time.

    Linux User #296285
    Get Counted

  6. #6
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Lazydog View Post
    Yes, RH9 is not worth it to run anymore because it is no longer updated.



    named.conf does not use resolv.conf for anything.
    Actually, i believe the problem was the dhcp clients, because the mail was broken on the clients not on the server.

    Quote Originally Posted by Segfault View Post
    May I say something? ... Thank you, here we go:

    Please get rid of RH-9. It is an ancient distribution, it hasn't had security updates for long, long time. Using insecure operating systems poses risk to the whole internet.
    Yes, it's an ancient distribution, but i can't change linux distribution now. Maybe, i'll replace it with fedora, but i should take a lot of time to do it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...