Results 1 to 5 of 5
I'm trying to install our last package and getting conflicting confirmation messages from rpm when I try to confirm the installation:
$ rpm -ivh compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3.x86_64.rpm
Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
package compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3 ...
- 09-17-2009 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Jackson, MS
- Posts
- 3
Conflicting package messages !!
I'm trying to install our last package and getting conflicting confirmation messages from rpm when I try to confirm the installation:
$ rpm -ivh compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3.x86_64.rpm
Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
package compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3 is already installed
$ rpm -q --qf '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} (%{ARCH})\n' compat-libstdc++
package compat-libstdc++ is not installed
$ rpm -qav | grep compat-libstdc
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3
compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.7.2
$ rpm -ev compat-libstdc*
error: package compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3.i386.rpm is not installed
error: package compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3.ia64.rpm is not installed
error: package compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3.x86_64.rpm is not installed
$
Is this package installed or not? Is there some rpm database that may be corrupted?
- 09-17-2009 #2Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Portsmouth, UK
- Posts
- 539
Hi zonkel,
compat-libstdc++ comes in a few guises, your trying to install the "33" version, odd naming convention never really looked into why it's used though.
try:
To remove all of the compat-libstdc++ packages (x86_64 and i386) you can use the --allmatches switchCode:$ rpm -q --qf '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} (%{ARCH})\n' compat-libstdc++-33
Code:$ rpm -e --allmatches compat-libstdc++-33
RHCE #100-015-395
Please don't PM me with questions as no reply may offend, that's what the forums are for.
- 09-17-2009 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 8
Use rpm -qil compat-libstdc++......... to find out where its supposed to be installed and then go and track it down.
You can always use the '--force' option in rpm or rebuild the rpm database if you think its become corrupt.
- 09-18-2009 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Jackson, MS
- Posts
- 3
OK good deal, adding the -33 does solve this issue, thanks.
- 09-18-2009 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Jackson, MS
- Posts
- 3
Had to use the -33 with this suggested by mantob but this gives all the details about the package - thnks


Reply With Quote