Results 1 to 6 of 6
A server of mine is running of a 128GB disk, 64 bit-system, kernel 2.6
I've been trying to add an external-controlled- raid5 array ( a total of 40TB in size).
...
- 06-09-2010 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 3
40TB file-system ? (64-bit FC 13)
A server of mine is running of a 128GB disk, 64 bit-system, kernel 2.6
I've been trying to add an external-controlled- raid5 array ( a total of 40TB in size).
1. used GNU parted to partition /dev/sdb (raid5 array )
I've gotten warning: the resulting parition is not properly aligned for best performance
Although that process turned out to be ok, making filesystem failed
2. mk2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1
output: size of device is too big to be expressed in 32 bits using a block size of 4096
any idea will be greaT!
I thought the system has been running 64 bits.
thanks
- 06-10-2010 #2Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 8,974
Did you try to create an LVM2 volume? It should handle that size array.
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 06-11-2010 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 3
hi,
yes I was able to create a full of 40TB LVM volume.
I had meant mkfs -t ext3 on that LVM volume still failed
it's same error that mkfs returned.
anyidea?
thanks!
- 06-11-2010 #4
You hit a limit of ext3 here.
A 16TByte volume is the maximum it can do.
ext4 can theoreticcall do more (1 Exabyte), but is restricted by the e2fsprogs user space programs, which still are limited to 16TByte.
My advice would be to use xfs.You must always face the curtain with a bow.
- 06-11-2010 #5
- 06-14-2010 #6Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 3
Thanks all
I think xfs is much better. Its performance (on top of ARECA controller) is superb


Reply With Quote
