Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 6 of 6
A server of mine is running of a 128GB disk, 64 bit-system, kernel 2.6 I've been trying to add an external-controlled- raid5 array ( a total of 40TB in size). ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3

    40TB file-system ? (64-bit FC 13)

    A server of mine is running of a 128GB disk, 64 bit-system, kernel 2.6
    I've been trying to add an external-controlled- raid5 array ( a total of 40TB in size).

    1. used GNU parted to partition /dev/sdb (raid5 array )
    I've gotten warning: the resulting parition is not properly aligned for best performance

    Although that process turned out to be ok, making filesystem failed

    2. mk2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1
    output: size of device is too big to be expressed in 32 bits using a block size of 4096
    any idea will be greaT!
    I thought the system has been running 64 bits.

    thanks

  2. #2
    Linux Guru Rubberman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
    Posts
    8,974
    Did you try to create an LVM2 volume? It should handle that size array.
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
    Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3
    hi,
    yes I was able to create a full of 40TB LVM volume.
    I had meant mkfs -t ext3 on that LVM volume still failed
    it's same error that mkfs returned.

    anyidea?

    thanks!

  4. #4
    Linux Guru Irithori's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    2,097
    You hit a limit of ext3 here.
    A 16TByte volume is the maximum it can do.

    ext4 can theoreticcall do more (1 Exabyte), but is restricted by the e2fsprogs user space programs, which still are limited to 16TByte.


    My advice would be to use xfs.
    You must always face the curtain with a bow.

  5. #5
    Linux Guru Rubberman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
    Posts
    8,974
    Quote Originally Posted by Irithori View Post
    You hit a limit of ext3 here.
    A 16TByte volume is the maximum it can do.

    ext4 can theoreticcall do more (1 Exabyte), but is restricted by the e2fsprogs user space programs, which still are limited to 16TByte.


    My advice would be to use xfs.
    You might be able to get 40TB to work with ext3 if you change the block size with the -b block-size option to mkfs.ext3.
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
    Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!

  6. #6
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3
    Thanks all
    I think xfs is much better. Its performance (on top of ARECA controller) is superb

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...