Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Hi guys, I am setting up a server and trying to access its partition over the nfs on a client machine. Our server has 4 1.5TB disks and the idea ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    11

    Question nfs acting weird for different size partition

    Hi guys,
    I am setting up a server and trying to access its partition over the nfs on a client machine.
    Our server has 4 1.5TB disks and the idea was to make a RAID 5 out of it.
    Now here is the problem:
    When I used only 1 disk that is nfs partition was of 1.5TB, I got fine speed(30MBps), but with multiple disks whether I am making 3TB (Raid 10) or 4.5TB (Raid 5), I get a really poor speed of 5-6MBps. I/O just waits
    But for all above cases, disk I/O locally works fine.
    Does anyone knows any NFS limitation that is causing this problem?
    Thanks,
    Abhi.

  2. #2
    Linux Guru Rubberman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
    Posts
    8,974
    Is this hardware or software RAID? Also, is this read speed, write speed, or a mix? How are you testing?
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
    Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    11
    Hi Rubberman,
    This behavior was with both soft as well as hard RAID.
    The speed is writing speed. Reading speed was just fine.
    On server:
    /etc/exports
    /mnt/bioexp 172.16.0.0/16(sync,rw,no_root_squash)

    On client:
    /etc/fstab
    fs-bioexp:/mnt/bioexp /mnt/bioexp nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14,intr 0 0

    On client when I run dd command as:
    dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/bioexp/1gb bs=1024 count 1000000
    the time taken to run this command is 200secs

    But on server locally, the dd command runs in about 4-5secs

    Thanks,
    Abhi.

  4. #4
    Linux Guru Rubberman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
    Posts
    8,974
    Most RAID implementations (especially RAID 5/10) slow down considerably for write operations. This is likely what you are experiencing. After all, the array has to have the parity bits computed and written as well as the data, and parts of the data has to be written to multiple drives (striping). Reads will generally be as fast, or faster than a single drive or logical volume set, but as you see, writes are another story altogether.
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
    Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!

  5. #5
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    11
    But even RAID 0 is behaving the same way. Logically RAID 0 should be faster than single disk.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...