Results 1 to 10 of 20
Ok i have a problem, i'm attempting to create a dual boot system my master hdd having a XP os, and a slave drive with the redhat 9 os. However ...
- 04-13-2005 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 8
Big problem installing redhat 9
Ok i have a problem, i'm attempting to create a dual boot system my master hdd having a XP os, and a slave drive with the redhat 9 os. However it all installs ok, configured the video card (mine isn't listed so i had to set it at generic vesa 128mb), and set my monitor to unprobed (again my monitor wasn't on the list.). But when it comes to reboot the system, it reboots i get the boot loader, i select redhat to load i get a bunch of garbage on the screen about kernals then the system crashes. Something about "Kernal
anic! kernal kill init" or something. Can anyone help me here?
I'm running this machine:
AMD Sempron
512mb ram
128mb ASUS V415 video card
80gb HDD (XP os)
20gb HDD (slave-redhat)
Benq LCD flat screen monitor (FP531)
- 04-13-2005 #2
The exact error message would be a big help. Kernel panics are not gui-related, so I don't see your vid card or monitor being the problem there (although you may have to jump through some hoops to get them working properly later).
Out of curiosity, is there any reason that you went with such an old distro?There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
- Jeremy S. Anderson
- 04-13-2005 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 8
Exact error...lol...there is no messgae just numbers and poop. The screen moves so fast, all i get is the end load of garbage.The exact error message would be a big help. Kernel panics are not gui-related, so I don't see your vid card or monitor being the problem there (although you may have to jump through some hoops to get them working properly later).
Out of curiosity, is there any reason that you went with such an old distro?
I went with redhat 9 because thats all i had, and i got it umm last year free with a book.
EDIT: I'll reboot again and write down exactly what it says on the screen, at the end (it moves fast).
- 04-13-2005 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 8
Heres what i get on my screen:
Code:*pde=00000000 0ops:0000 CPU:0 EIP:0060:[<c010ab2c>] Not Tainted EFLAGS:00010002 EIP is at disable [Kernal] 0x4c (2.4.20-6) eax:00000000 epx:fffff680 ecx:ffffffed edx:c036ef80 esi:00000293 edi:00000000 ebp:ffffffed esp:dffb9f48 ds:0068 es:0068 ss:0068 process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=dffb9000 stack fx6ed 00000000 c03c9e80 c01bd14c ffffffed 00000000 c031s9a0 00000000 c03c9e80 00000000 00000000 c01bdc28 c03c9e80 00000000 00000028 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 Call trace:[<c01bd14c>] probe_hwif [Kernal] 0x27c (0xdffb9f54)) [<c01bdc28>] ideprobe_init [Kernal] oxb8 (0xdffb9f74)) [<c0105053>] init [Kernal] 0x13 (0xdffb9f74)) [<c0105040>] init [Kernal] 0x0 (0xdff9fe0)) [<c010742d>] Kernal_thread_helper [Kernal] 0x5 (0xdffb9ff0)) Code: ff 50 10 eb d0 eb 0d 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 <0>Kernal panic: Attempted to kill init!
- 04-13-2005 #5
Usually failures like that are from bad media or bad hardware. Did you test your media at the beginning of the install?
Overclocking can also do weird things...do you have any overclocking options set in your BIOS?There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
- Jeremy S. Anderson
- 04-13-2005 #6Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 8
My macine isn't overclocked, and my hardware works fine with windows XP, this is a fairly new system only got it 2 months ago. What hardware could be causing the problem? Is it because i'm running a AMD? If redhat has problems with my system, is there any distro you could recommend that may work properly?
EDT: i'm new with linux, my "redhat for dummies" book said it should test my video and monitor hardware with a "can you see this message" thingy - that never happened.
- 04-13-2005 #7
If the system is that new then I'm not surprised you're having difficulties...RedHat 9 is several years old. If you want to stick with RedHat, then you should probably go with Fedora Core 3. If not, there are scores of other distros to choose from.
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
- Jeremy S. Anderson
- 04-13-2005 #8No. Your processor brand doesn't matter in this case.
Originally Posted by LoneSoldier Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 04-13-2005 #9Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 8
Well thanks for the help, shame it turned out this way. I've decided on Suse (recommended by a friend). And reformatted the HDD the old redhat was on, do you know if i need to do anything to prepare the hdd for the suse installation or is it like the redhat 9 with a auto partitioning thingy?
- 04-13-2005 #10
It'll do autopartitioning for you. Of course, always check and make sure it's not doing anything to your WinXP partition, just to be anal. Is it Suse 9.2? That's the most recent (for the next week or so anyway).
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
- Jeremy S. Anderson


Reply With Quote