Results 1 to 3 of 3
I posted to Fedora's bugzilla:
Description of problem:
K3bsetup is not with this release.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
K3b 0.11.9 (using KDE 3.2.2-3 Red Hat)
How reproducible:
...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 05-04-2004 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 5
Here is one for the books !!!
I posted to Fedora's bugzilla:
Description of problem:
K3bsetup is not with this release.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
K3b 0.11.9 (using KDE 3.2.2-3 Red Hat)
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
-----------------------------------------------
This was the response they gave me... LMAO !!!
Additional Comment #1 From Bill Nottingham on 2004-04-28 23:16
It's intentional; we're not going to ship an application that has a
sole use of creating security holes.
Additional Comment #2 From Doncho N. Gunchev on 2004-05-04 04:47
Maybe the menu entry should be removed to avoid confusion?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I haven't heard form either KDE or the Maintainer of K3b of ANY security issues with K3bsetup.
Did I miss a bug report here or is this person pulling my leg or has no clue what I submitted ? LOL
- 05-04-2004 #2Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 5
I guess I will respond :P
I must say that the Fedora Team is the only distro I've seen make this kind of change. Sounds to me like they are getting a little anal...
- 05-04-2004 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 5
Thier 2nd response...
------- Additional Comments From notting@redhat.com 2004-05-04 10:55 -------
The menu entry is removed.
k3bsetup changes the owner and group of the CD devices, and the
permissions on various binary apps. All of this is unnecessary; ergo,
it's not going to be shipped. (And making things like cdrecord, etc.
setuid *will* open up security holes in the future.)
Well, I guess the Fedora Team isn't all that different from the original Redhat Team.
Yes, in certain aspects they are right, but I was under the impression Fedora was
more for the "EndUser" than it's big brother RHEL.
I guess Fedora was more of a corporate move for sme reason and not for the
Open Source world



