Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 5 of 5
I've set multiple MX records with the same priority in my zone file. How will it work ? Will all be checked simultaneously ? what will be the pros and ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    Just Joined! pratapsingh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    82

    Exclamation Multiple MX records with same priorty number?


    I've set multiple MX records with the same priority in my zone file.
    How will it work ? Will all be checked simultaneously ? what will be the pros and cons of doing that ? please
    explain me how I could prioritize Mail servers ?

  2. #2
    Just Joined! pratapsingh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    82
    I got the answer from this website
    MX record: Information from Answers.com

  3. #3
    Just Joined! pratapsingh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    82
    Same Priority number for MX servers

    -->>When the preference numbers are the same for two MX servers, they have the
    same priority, hence those two terms are used interchangeably.

    To provide reliable mail transmission, the SMTP client must be able to try
    (and retry) each of the relevant addresses in this list(RR records or zone db
    file) in order, until a delivery attempt succeeds. If there is more than one
    MX record with the same preference number, all of those must be tried before
    moving on to lower-priority entries.

    Basically this is basically used for load balancing, if you own
    that (backup, other mail server) server too.
    Otherwise there are many reson to do not assign the same priority number to MX
    records, those reason are here

    * * *the backup server is owned by a different company or organization
    * * *the backup server does not have direct access to the primary mail * *
    storage
    * * *the backup server cannot determine valid recipient addresses
    * * *the backup server's Internet bandwidth costs more
    * * *the backup server has significantly less Internet bandwidth
    * * *the backup server has a high-latency Internet connection

    *
    And, they will not be checked simultaneously, the DNS server is free to
    carefully manipulate its balancing based on any method, including round robin
    DNS, mail server load, or some undisclosed priority scheme.

    Assigning the same preference value to all of the available servers provides
    the same benefit and may even help avoid overload situations and thereby
    increase system throughput by decreasing latency.

    If you want to prioritize your MX records Then assign the lowest number to
    preferred mail server and highest number to backup server.

  4. $spacer_open
    $spacer_close
  5. #4
    Linux Engineer jledhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,077
    I would make sure all of your mx records handle email the same. For example, if you have all your spam control on your primary mx and just want a secondary for failover, but it doesn't have as tight or up to date spam control, guess what? spammers notoriously use secondary or lower priority mx records for spamming. so in general I would use the same setup and adjust the priority based on hardware specs, not on which one handles spam or virus' the best.

  6. #5
    Just Joined! pratapsingh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    82
    Hi , could you explain me i did not understand that part?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •