Results 1 to 8 of 8
My parents company has downsized somewhat over the last year - there are now only about 5 users. They are currently using their old Windows SBS which is far more ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 05-17-2012 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 3
What distribution to use to set up server/NAS
My parents company has downsized somewhat over the last year - there are now only about 5 users. They are currently using their old Windows SBS which is far more than they need and is running out of space and speed.
So the idea is to replace it with a smaller server - I have an HP Proliant microserver and was wondering what would be best to install?
They do not need the server to have any sort of user authentication or email support. It would pretty much just be used for sharing files and perhaps as a print server if the printers can't be plugged directly into the router.
They would need to have remote access to the files, be it via some sort of web interface or via a VPN into the server. The client machines will all be running Windows 7 or XP.
I was also thinking of setting up CrashPlan on it so their laptops can be backed up onto it.
I was initially thinking of just using Ubuntu and setting up some Samba shares, but would something like FreeNAS be better for this?
thanks
- 05-17-2012 #2
I wouldn't use Ubuntu for a production server like this. You want stability more than cutting-edge features.
I'm a big fan of RPM-based systems, so I would use RHEL or CentOS (depending on budget requirements) for this.
I'm not personally familiar with Debian-based systems, so I can't recommend one for production use. Hopefully, someone else here will be able to provide a recommendation.
- 05-17-2012 #3
Debian or CentOS would both do the job quite nicely. However, if you are supporting it then I'd go with the distro you are most familiar with.
If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.
The Fifth Continent reborn
- 05-17-2012 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 3
Well i have only really used ubuntu before, which is why i went with it initially. It's not going to have much heavy use - just some document sharing, maybe photos, nothing too taxing.
I might have a look at creating vpn server on it, otherwise do you know of any web-based file managers that could work?
thanks
- 05-17-2012 #5Trusted Penguin
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 3,657
if your clients are windows-based, why would you want a web-based file manager? or do you just mean you can administer it via a web GUI? If so, samba and swat (samba web admin tool) ought to suffice. i know the required packages are in the Fedora 16/CentOS 6.x repos.
- 05-18-2012 #6Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 3
I would like to have an administration web GUI so will probably look at swat.
I was only really thinking of having a web-based file manager for the times they may not have access from their laptops so don't have a VPN set up. It's not too vital though since most of the time they will be accessing it from there.
- 05-19-2012 #7Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Virginia, USA
- Posts
- 561
You might want to check out freeNas. Here are some links for what you wish to accomplish:
Active Directory - Freenas
Windows (CIFS) Shares - Freenas
- 05-19-2012 #8Trusted Penguin
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 3,657
i just happened across this article about a web-based file manager. no idea if it is good or sux, just passing it along...


Reply With Quote
