Results 1 to 4 of 4
Hello All:
I am running Samba on a Fedora 17 server and it seems to be working; however, I am wondering if I have a problem with the way I ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 12-21-2012 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 2
SAMBA log files with strange errors
Hello All:
I am running Samba on a Fedora 17 server and it seems to be working; however, I am wondering if I have a problem with the way I set it up that could be adversely affecting either performance or security (or something else). There are messages in the log files that I don't understand and cannot seem to learn about via Googling for hours.
Here is my smb.conf followed by some log file examples...
Code:[global] workgroup = MYENTERPRISE netbios name = Oudebok server string = LAN Fileserver log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords = yes browseable = yes # hosts allow = 172.16.1. # Modified to allow for VPN connections to Samba shares hosts allow = 172.16.1. 10.123.214. localhost bind interfaces only = true interfaces = eth0 172.16.1. tap0 10.123.214. lo 127.0.0.1 # Modified to eliminate getpeername error smb ports = 139 # Added to ensure that Oudebok is the primary source for browseable Samba resources local master = Yes preferred master = Yes os level = 17 [homes] comment = Oudebok Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No browseable = No # guest ok = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /usr/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [FILESHARE] comment = Oudebok Fileshare Directory path = /fileshare read only = NoCan anyone here help me figure out what is going on with these errors, or what else I can post to investigate this?Code:tail -20 /var/log/samba/log.nmbd [2012/12/21 08:47:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 08:52:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 08:57:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 09:02:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 09:07:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 09:12:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 09:17:02, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 09:22:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 09:27:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address ! [2012/12/21 09:32:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:759(queue_query_name) queue_query_name: interface 1 has NULL IP address !
Thanks in advance!
Tom
- 12-23-2012 #2Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 119
Samba can be very verbose in it's logging. That's what samba log files look like. You should see mine going back to 2005. Anything is a reason to log. Nothing is a reason to log. From the looks of your log dump, samba is just saying "Hey! I'm here!" every 5 minutes on the dot because it has nothing to do. Samba will make an empty log file like:
just from a ping on it's port.Code:-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Oct 4 2006 log.190.48.73.169 -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 10 2006 log.219.241.126.52 -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Aug 26 2006 log.219.74.62.206 -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Oct 5 2006 log.220.209.25.102 -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Jul 7 2006 log.222.147.240.105 -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Jul 7 2006 log.222.149.41.45
Anyway, that's my best guess.
- 12-23-2012 #3Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 1,722
Samba's nmbd process replicates NetBIOS-type broadcasts/name resolution for "Windows for Workgroups." Your log is nmbd telling you that one of your interfaces (NIC's) has a "null" IP address. Whether or not this is valid may depend on your config. Try pasting your error message into Google. The "lo" and 127.0.0.1 are redundant - I'd remove the "lo" based on the bug report.
- 12-28-2012 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 2
Thanks to both of you for your replies. Although I did not see the Bug Report when first searching for help via Google, I followed your link to it and I understand now that it was the same scenario for me. I removed "lo" as you suggested and (after restarting smbd and nmbd) the logging of that particular error has stopped. So I noticed this error or warning in the log after restarting:
...which I pasted into Google and spent a couple of hours sifting through pages where it doesn't appear to be relevant, just part of a log or screen capture. Is it reasonable for me to conclude that this entry ("standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option") is unimportant?Code:[2012/12/27 08:02:35, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:66(terminate) Got SIGTERM: going down... [2012/12/27 08:02:35, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:861(main) nmbd version 3.6.6-92.fc17 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2011 [2012/12/27 08:02:35, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:889(main) standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option
Thanks again for your assistance!


Reply With Quote
