Bah, watercool and forget it
I'm no fanboy, but I run all AMD. I have 4 computers with AMD chips and I have no problems. I saw that video too. The reason why the XP cpu burned and the P4 didn't is because the Intel chip had thermal throttling enabled. The socket462 mobos have the same features now.
There are differences in thermal tolerance for each cpu, so comparison based on temps, in some cases, can be misleading. For instance, alot of overclockers run their older P4s at 45C+. I think they've been reading about AMD chips and getting confused, because they seem shocked when their P4 1.8 running @ 3.0GHz and 1.75v suddenly dies

. For an AMD chip that would be fine, but for intel...?
Now, I'll admit AMD has it's shortcomings in the thermal dept. The chips can really warm up a room in the summer, but then again I like to overclock as much as possible, when I choose to do it.
The appeal of AMD is that I can buy a 2100+ (or even a 1700+ for $50 dollars US) and overclock it to ~2400 MHz and, if I use a 200MHz+ fsb as opposed to playing with multipliers to achieve this speed, I can run even with a 3.0GHz intel cpu. Of course, the CPU will put out 110 watts of heat, and that is the downside; but if I watercool who cares?
Basically, I have a decently quiet PC, it runs alongside a 3.0GHz intel part, and I paid $61.00 for the cpu as opposed to $370.00 (P4 3.0GHz 533 fsb). I paid $180.00 for my watercooling. My cpu + WC = $241.00, and I still have enough to upgrade my memory 512MB before I reach the price of the intel cpu alone, and then I may still have some change to spare. All my prices are taken off today's pricewatch.com listings BTW.
Sorry, I know this is horribly off topic, but sometimes I take the bait and run with it
