View Poll Results: What is the best Linux distribution to have a WebServer running on it?
- Voters
- 9. You may not vote on this poll
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Hi guys, Im just wondering
What do you think is the best distro to have a webServer running on it?...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 04-13-2005 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 2
Best WebServer Distro
Hi guys, Im just wondering
What do you think is the best distro to have a webServer running on it?
- 04-13-2005 #2
Re: Best WebServer Distro
I voted for Fedora because that is what I use. I would use slackware or one of the bsd's but I believe FC3 (no X) is a good choice, because of the ease of install and the reliabilty
Originally Posted by -Ares-
top - 08:44:35 up 56 days, 9:25, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Swap: 522072k total, 144k used, 521928k free, 26600k cached
I think that is pretty good.
The only reason it was 56 days was a power outage.
BTW I host 6 virtual domains on here
2 race fan sites
Slackware and BSD I believe have a faster kernel but I like the ease of FEDORA Server for newbs.
Mike
Some people have told me they don't think a fat penguin really embodies the grace of Linux, which just tells me they have never seen a angry penguin charging at them in excess of 100mph. They'd be a lot more careful about what they say if they had.
-- Linus Torvalds
- 04-13-2005 #3Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 609
First choice: Red Hat
Second choice: CentOS
Third: Fedora
- 04-13-2005 #4
Truth is, if you configure a machine correctly, just about any distro will run reliably and well. I have a Mandrake machine that's been up for somewhere around 280 days, with the last shutdown being from a power failure (I took the opportunity to update the kernel at that point, as well), and I have seen RedHat machines stay up for pretty much forever as well. Talk to enough people, and you'll get those stories about most distros.
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
- Jeremy S. Anderson
- 04-13-2005 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 2
You host 6 domains? Wow, what kind of conection do you have? Have you have any problems with Fedora?I voted for Fedora because that is what I use. I would use slackware or one of the bsd's but I believe FC3 (no X) is a good choice, because of the ease of install and the reliabilty
top - 08:44:35 up 56 days, 9:25, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Swap: 522072k total, 144k used, 521928k free, 26600k cached
I think that is pretty good.
The only reason it was 56 days was a power outage.
BTW I host 6 virtual domains on here
2 race fan sites
Slackware and BSD I believe have a faster kernel but I like the ease of FEDORA Server for newbs.
Mike Very Happy
- 04-13-2005 #6
i voted slack as i think i heard it's really good for apache, tho i dont use it for my web server!!
I use SuSE 9.2 Pro for my server. It's more than a web server is my reasoning, and i know how to do it on SuSE
"I am not an alcoholic, alcoholics go to meetings"
Registered Linux user = #372327
- 04-14-2005 #7I actually have a 6meg down 768 up dsl, but linux with no x has very little overhead.
Originally Posted by -Ares-
Some people have told me they don't think a fat penguin really embodies the grace of Linux, which just tells me they have never seen a angry penguin charging at them in excess of 100mph. They'd be a lot more careful about what they say if they had.
-- Linus Torvalds
- 04-14-2005 #8Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Your SQL Server
- Posts
- 95
i voted other for FreeBSD, i think that the install is one of the best, and ports makes it easy to setup a server, and it is more secure than linux, so i find it to suit my needs well


Reply With Quote
