Results 1 to 2 of 2
Hi -
I'm running red hat 9.0 and just upgraded my samba server to the latest 3.0.21a version.
The last message from rpm -Uvh was:
Code:
error: %postun(samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0) scriptlet failed, ...
- 01-07-2006 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 2
Samba 3.0.21a upgrade failed
Hi -
I'm running red hat 9.0 and just upgraded my samba server to the latest 3.0.21a version.
The last message from rpm -Uvh was:
It appears to be working as I was able to start samba.Code:error: %postun(samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
I did notice that when I started samba manually via /etc/init.d/smb start I only got one "[OK]" message for samba starting and not for nmbd starting also. However when I do a ps I can see nmdb running:Code:[root@RAMAIR samba]# smbstatus Samba version 3.0.21a PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4092 denis users transam (192.168.0.100) Service pid machine Connected at ------------------------------------------------------- denis 4092 transam Sat Jan 7 00:28:08 2006 No locked files
Another observation is samba isn't "smbd -D" anymore. Now I have these [smbd] processes.Code:[root@RAMAIR samba]# ps -ef | egrep "smb|nmb" | grep -v grep root 4081 1 0 00:27 ? 00:00:00 [smbd] root 4082 4081 0 00:27 ? 00:00:00 [smbd] root 4086 1 0 00:27 ? 00:00:00 nmbd -D root 4092 4081 0 00:28 ? 00:00:00 [smbd]
Here's my logs:
log.nmbd - includes shutdown of old version and start of new:
log.smbd since startup:Code:Netbios nameserver version 2.2.7a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 [2006/01/06 23:38:36, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235) find_response_record: response packet id 19876 received with no matching record. [2006/01/06 23:38:36, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235) find_response_record: response packet id 19877 received with no matching record. [2006/01/07 00:16:32, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(59) Got SIGTERM: going down... [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(724) Netbios nameserver version 3.0.21a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2005
Has anyone run into the same error during install? I've searched google and found a couple of hits but no explinations.Code:smbd version 3.0.21a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2005 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 1 (min password length), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 2 (password history), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 3 (user must logon to change password), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 4 (maximum password age), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 5 (minimum password age), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 6 (lockout duration), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 7 (reset count minutes), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 8 (bad lockout attempt), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 9 (disconnect time), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 1] lib/account_pol.c:account_policy_get(324) account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32 failed for field 10 (refuse machine password change), returning 0 [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:upgrade_to_version_4(439) upgrade_to_version_4: upgrading printer security descriptors [2006/01/07 00:27:23, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:upgrade_to_version_5(506) upgrade_to_version_5: normalizing printer keys [2006/01/07 00:28:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1222) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2006/01/07 00:28:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(554) write_data: write failure in writing to client 192.168.0.100. Error Connection reset by peer [2006/01/07 00:28:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(762) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2006/01/07 00:28:08, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(666) transam (192.168.0.100) connect to service denis initially as user denis (uid=502, gid=100) (pid 4092)
I'm about to configure samba to be a PDC and now I'm worried that something isn't going to work.
Thanks for you help!
- 01-07-2006 #2Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 2
I decided to fully uninstall samba (rpm -e) and then install from scratch the newer version.
The install was successful.
There are still the same differences with the processes but I guess this is just a change in this release since samba is working fine.


Reply With Quote