Results 1 to 2 of 2
We have a firewall running on Slack 7. This was set up by a an admin over 7 years ago and until now, no change has been needed. But, now, ...
- 01-18-2009 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
- Posts
- 1
ipchains on Slack 7
We have a firewall running on Slack 7. This was set up by a an admin over 7 years ago and until now, no change has been needed. But, now, we need to provide Remote Desktop Access to a computer on the internal network. The IP is 66.225.136.27 and is in a range that the firewall protects.
I have tried several solutions on the internet and they do not work. The firewall is using ipchains.
Here is the output of "cat ipchains.rules "
:input ACCEPT
:forward DENY
:output ACCEPT
-A input -s 206.45.100.0/255.255.255.0 -d ! 206.45.100.0/255.255.255.0 137:139 -i eth1 -p 17 -j DENY
-A input -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 137:139 -i eth0 -p 17 -j DENY
-A input -s 66.225.136.200/255.255.255.255 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 514:514 -p 17 -j ACCEPT
-A input -s 139.142.222.217/255.255.255.255 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 514:514 -i eth0 -p 17 -j ACCEPT
-A input -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 514:514 -p 17 -j DENY
-A input -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 515:515 -i eth0 -p 6 -j REJECT
-A input -s 206.45.100.5/255.255.255.255 -d ! 206.45.100.0/255.255.255.0 -i eth1 -j DENY -l
-A input -s 206.45.100.1/255.255.255.255 -d ! 206.45.100.0/255.255.255.0 -j DENY -l
-A input -s 206.45.100.2/255.255.255.255 -d ! 206.45.100.0/255.255.255.0 -j DENY -l
-A input -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 3306:3306 -i eth0 -p 6 -j DENY
-A forward -s 206.45.100.0/255.255.255.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -j MASQ -m 10001
-A output -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 137:139 -i eth0 -p 6 -j DENY
Can anybody help? The port for RDP is 3389 by the way. Slack 7 is on kernel 2.2.19
- 01-19-2009 #2
Welcome to the forums!
Aw, with the old admin dead and buried, nobody has seen chance to update the firewall for seven years?
If I where you I would have someone look at it in greater detail than I can ATM, because the virtual landscape has changed over the years and attackers have become more clever (or their tools more advanced in any case).
But as to your question, I don't see why a simple
-A forward -i {wan_interface} -s {source_address} -p {protocol} --destination-port {portnumber} -d {destination_address} -j accept
Wouldn't do the trick?
Maybe you can log your rule so you know what happens behind the scenes?
IPCHAINS-HOWTO
ipchainsCan't tell an OS by it's GUI


Reply With Quote