Results 1 to 7 of 7
Do I need to upgrade any packages in slack 9.1 to use the 2.6.10 kernel....
- 02-06-2005 #1Linux User
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- TEXAS
- Posts
- 314
2.6 kernel and slackware 9.1
Do I need to upgrade any packages in slack 9.1 to use the 2.6.10 kernel.
The computer made me do it!! Slackware
and SUSE too Gig\'em WHOOOOP!!
\"God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain amount of tasks, At the rate I\'m going I will never die.\" (I don\'t know)
- 02-06-2005 #2
No, you should be fine.
- 02-07-2005 #3Linux User
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- TEXAS
- Posts
- 314
second question
upgrading from apache 1.3 to 2.0 Is there anything I need to take into consideration or can I just install the packagesThe computer made me do it!! Slackware
and SUSE too Gig\'em WHOOOOP!!
\"God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain amount of tasks, At the rate I\'m going I will never die.\" (I don\'t know)
- 02-07-2005 #4
You can pretty much always "just install the packages", as it will yell at you about any missing dependencies you might have.
- 02-07-2005 #5Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Ft. Polk, LA
- Posts
- 796
You should get the new module-init-tools when upgrading to a 2.6 kernel, else you might have problems loading modules and stuff.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty
- 02-08-2005 #6I'd also suggest grabbing the new headers and re-compiling your tool-chain (glibc, gcc, binutils, zlib, ncurses, texinfo) with nptl.
Originally Posted by valan "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so."
~Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- 02-08-2005 #7
Also, even if you don't recompile your toolchain with nptl, it's still a good idea to grab the newest versions anyway.


Reply With Quote