Results 1 to 9 of 9
Hi,
I installed the acrobat reader from adobe's website by downloading the .rpm and converting it with rpm2tgz, then using installpkg. The problem is I don't know how to run ...
- 06-02-2005 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 4
where's acrobat? hopefully an easy question...
Hi,
I installed the acrobat reader from adobe's website by downloading the .rpm and converting it with rpm2tgz, then using installpkg. The problem is I don't know how to run the program now! I have no idea where to look for the executable or even what it's called! anybody able to help?
- 06-02-2005 #2
Since you used installpkg, you will be able to go to /var/log/packages and find a text file of the package you installed (likely something with adobe and some version numbers). If you open that file up in your favorite editor, it will tell you where all the files were installed to. You will probably be able to find the executable somewhere near the top of the file and likely in a /bin directory.
Join the Open Source Revolution. Support GNU/Linux.
Find me at: www.deeksworld.com
Registered GNU/Linux User #395777
- 06-02-2005 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 69
acroread
- 06-02-2005 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 4
thanks for your answers, but the first method showed that the rpm2pkg tool didn't work cos the file installed nothing!
- 06-02-2005 #5
Why don't you just download the source for adobe reader from http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html (select linux(.tar.gz) from the platform menu).
dylunio
- 06-02-2005 #6
But there are some open source programs who can read PDF files as well. XPDF. KPDF are some examples. IIRC you'll need to install ghostscript. Those programs are on the Slackware cd in slackware package format. Use pkgtool to install these.
I\'m so tired .....
#200472
- 06-03-2005 #7Are you sure that this is source? I thought Adobe's acrobat reader was free but closed-source?
Originally Posted by dylunio Stumbling around the 'net:
www.cloudyuseful.com
- 06-03-2005 #8Err, yeah it may not be the source, it may be a binary, but it should be easier to install on slack than converting a rpm.
Originally Posted by psic
dylunio
- 06-03-2005 #9
I think it is a binary installer.
I\'m so tired .....
#200472


Reply With Quote