Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 5 of 5
So I was looking through the changelog and noticed that Pat is finally including a pre-compiled version of the 2.6.17 kernel. That's pretty amazing seeing that in 10.2 all we ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    The Hot Humid South
    Posts
    602

    2.6 kernel in the new 11.0 version


    So I was looking through the changelog and noticed that Pat is finally including a pre-compiled version of the 2.6.17 kernel. That's pretty amazing seeing that in 10.2 all we had was a broken test26.i boot kernel and the source. The kernel is still in the testing/ folder, which is not included in the first CD (the only CD download), but definately a step in the right direction. Gotta wonder when will he make that the default. Seems like he still doesn't like GCC 4.x though.

    Anyway, no questions, I was just pointing out something exciting.
    "Today you are freer than ever to do what you want, provided you can pay for it!" --Bad Religion

  2. #2
    Linux Guru Juan Pablo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    /home/south_america/ecuador/quito
    Posts
    2,064
    I think the 2.6 kernel has always been in the testing folder since 10.0 ... as I read on a different thread he doesn't like 2.6 because it is always under development so more likely to have bugs nor as 2.4 which is not developed anymore and one of the main objectives of slack is to be stable.

    I hope he may create a bleeding edge version of slackware where he can put the new GCC and a nice 2.6 kernel.
    Put your hand in an oven for a minute and it will be like an hour, sit beside a beautiful woman for an hour and it will be like a minute, that is relativity. --Albert Einstein
    Linux User #425940

    Don't PM me with questions, instead post in the forums

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    13
    Slackware needs many things, at least from a desktop user's point of view. GCC, Qt, D-BUS, HAL, X.org...you name it (some to be added, some to be updated). We'll see how things will work out after the release of 11, and in what direction the development will continue.

    About the kernel - 2.6.17 is already in extra/.

  4. $spacer_open
    $spacer_close
  5. #4
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    668
    as discussed before, theres no reason to use xorg 7.0 and it will break things regarding the new location in /usr

    thats the main reason for no xorg 7.0, plus it doesnt offer anything over 6.9.0 I heard.

    it makes a fine desktop for me, I dont use HAL I use udev.

  6. #5
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    13
    Sooner or later, Slackware will have to inherit the Xorg 7 structure. Naturally, I'm also using udev. HAL's a fine addition, not a replacement. Slack makes a fine desktop for me too, but by default it lacks many features for a 'modern' distro, media notification being one of these features. I use udev from current, custom D-BUS and HAL packages, recompiled kdebase package for HAL support - now it's a fully functional and somewhat automated desktop. Plus, this is not by any means negative for stability or security.

    P.S.
    Ofcourse, don't get me wrong - we all love Slackware.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •