Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Hi everyone, I have been looking around for more info on load balancing, we currently have 2x servers configured with suse enterprise 10 and they are in a high availability ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined! Rickc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1

    Question Load Balancing an exsisting HA Pair

    Hi everyone,

    I have been looking around for more info on load balancing, we currently have 2x servers configured with suse enterprise 10 and they are in a high availability pair. Server A and Server B, server B takes over should A fail. The problem we are having is that the load is increasing on A so we want to add another server so the load can be shared to this server, server C.
    How can we do this?

    Thanks
    Rick

  2. #2
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,695
    Since no one has ANY idea WHAT you are trying to load balance, trying Google: load balance "application_to_balance" linux


  3. #3
    Linux Guru waterhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Franklin, Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,577
    This question was recently discussed in my local Linux User Group. It actually was about High Availability, but I believe it is the same thing.

    Here are links to some of the solutions that were suggested:
    http://crossroads.e-tunity.com/index.xr
    PF: Firewall Redundancy with CARP and pfsync
    Create a Load Balance Server Using Ubuntu « Code Ghar
    HomePage: Linux HA
    The Linux Virtual Server Project - Linux Server Cluster for Load Balancing
    IBM : developerWorks : Site maintenance

    Happy Reading!
    Paul

    Please do not send Private Messages to me with requests for help. I will not reply.

  4. #4
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,695
    HA and Load Balancing (LB) are *not* the same thing. One is redundancy - the other is spreading a load across multiple resources. Most effectively, they are used together. Implementation varies greatly depending on the resource/application that needs to be available.

    Active/Passive clusters are HA (resource is only active on one node at a time) while *some* Active/Active clusters could be HA and LB at the same time. DNS round-robin mechanisms are LB, etc.

    HA is about eliminating any single point of failure. LB is not. (If the DNS round-robin program/device dies, then DNS is offline. So this device is great for LB but fails as an HA design.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...