Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 4 of 4
I am replacing an old firewall server which is running SuSe 9.2 with a new firewall server (SuSE 10.2), all the configuration are the same, basically I copy susefirewall2 over, ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    26

    SuSEfirewall: odd situation

    I am replacing an old firewall server which is running SuSe 9.2 with a new firewall server (SuSE 10.2), all the configuration are the same, basically I copy susefirewall2 over, which contains all config of firewall.

    port 22 was open, so I can do "scp", now it gets blocked? is there any new rule from 10.2?

  2. #2
    Linux Newbie framp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    240
    I have 9.3 on my firewall and 10.2 on my desktop. I queried the SuSEfirewall2 versions and got

    Code:
    gateway:~ # rpm -qa | grep SuSEfirewall2
    SuSEfirewall2-3.3-18.2
    obelix:~ # rpm -qa | grep SuSEfirewall2
    SuSEfirewall2-3.5_SVNr159-4
    obelix:~ #
    So there are different versions and I expect there are changes in the configuration. So you have to go step by step through your old 9.2 config and update the new 10.2 config accordingly. But that's what I would do in any case to have the sensible firewall settings under control and to make sure the firewall is well configured.
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect." Linus Benedict Torvalds

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    26
    Thanks for the tip.

    The new SuSEfirewall2 can read all configuration from old version, and there is a little grammar change, but I think the rule stay unchanged, and for lower level, it is also using IPTABLES to restrict traffic.

    Will it be SSHD configuration issue?

  4. #4
    Linux Newbie framp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    240
    Quote Originally Posted by steeles
    ... but I think the rule stay unchanged...
    You have to compare the generated iptables rules to know for sure whether this statment is true

    Did you check /var/log/firewall for error messages for port 22? They might help to solve the problem.
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect." Linus Benedict Torvalds

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...