Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldmartian Ubuntu does not have kernel-sources package installed and it's not on the list in Synaptic. How do I get it? |
The files you need to compile kernel modules (which is what the Nvidia driver is) can be installed using this meta-package:
Code:
sudo apt-get install build-essential
Quote:
|
As for getting the nvidia driver, which one? I have a GeForce 9800 Gx3 and am running an AMD Anthalon Dual with 8GB of RAM. I don't know if my Ubuntu install is x64
|
You can find out by typing
uname -a and looking at the output. If it says X86, i386, i686 or something similar, it's 32-bit. If it says X86_64 or X64 it's 64-bit.
Your processor can run either 32-bit or 64-bit operating systems natively. The type of processor you have doesn't necessarily mean you're running 64-bit Linux.
Quote:
|
Would I use the Linux AMD64/EM64T?
|
You would install the AMD64/EM64T driver
ONLY if you're running a 64-bit version of Linux.
Quote:
|
How do I know that includes my Video card?
|
Look at the link on the left hand side of the driver page that says "List of Supported Devices". Yours is a very new chipset, so I'd recommend the absolute newest stable driver.
Quote:
|
Do I get the "Latest Version," or one of the "Legacy GPU" versions? If so which one?
|
Absolutely "latest." The 9000 series of GPUs are very new. They won't be considered "legacy" for another five or six years, if not longer.
Quote:
|
Are all nvidia boards supported by one driver for all Linux distros?
|
Yes. Nvidia uses a "unified" driver. The only difference is that some cards are too old to use the newer stuff, so you have to install the "legacy" unified driver.
Quote:
|
When I get the driver and runn it with "something like" sh NVIDIA-1.0.8174.run does the "something else mean a substitute of "sh" with "xh" or other aberration?
|
No, the "something like" means I'm not sure what the name of your Nvidia driver script is.
Do not substitute the "sh" part, substitute the name of the driver.
Quote:
|
Is the ".run" extension mean it's an executable file? Are there other command line incantations I must do to make it executable?
|
Actually, no. Linux doesn't use file extensions the way MS Windows does. Any file can be executable regardless of extension (and many files in Linux have no extensions whatsoever). The thing that makes something executable is the executable permission bit. You can set that with this command:
Code:
chmod +x nameofyourfile