Results 1 to 10 of 10
I just loaded ubuntu 9.10 on my laptop. Toshiba it loaded fine. So I ran update on the system and it updated to teh 9.20 kernel (dont remember act numbers)
...
- 03-11-2010 #1Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 163
ubuntu wont start after applying patches
I just loaded ubuntu 9.10 on my laptop. Toshiba it loaded fine. So I ran update on the system and it updated to teh 9.20 kernel (dont remember act numbers)
But now it wont reboot.
I get udevadm trigger is not permitted while udev is inconfigured
udev settle is not permitted while udev is unconfigured
svgalib: Cannot open /dev/mem
Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems:
-Boot args (cat /proc/cmdline)
- Check rootdelay= (did the system wait long enough?)
- Check root= (did the system wait long enought for device?)
- Missing modules (cat /proc modules; ls /dev)
ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/e1768deb-95e0-44bd-96b0-b725c73d42af does not exist. Dropping to a shell
Busy box v.1.13.3 (Ubuntu 1:1.1.13.3-1ubuntu7) built in shell (ash)
Enter help for a list of built-in commands
(initranfs)
edit:
Kernel 2.6.31-20-generic.
It had
kernel 2.6.31-14-generic
I was able to boot back into the old kernel.. so whats happening? why wont the upgraded kernel work?
- 03-11-2010 #2Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 8,977
I don't know why the update failed, but you should be able to boot the previous kernel and see what happened to fix it. Unbuntu as well as most Linux systems keep the last couple of kernels around, accessible via the grub boot menu (press any key before the count-down timer expires).
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 03-11-2010 #3Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 163
- 03-11-2010 #4
- 03-11-2010 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 72
[QUOTE
ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/e1768deb-95e0-44bd-96b0-b725c73d42af does not exist. Dropping to a shell
I was able to boot back into the old kernel.. so whats happening? why wont the upgraded kernel work?[/QUOTE]
It's a little odd that you're getting the "device does not exist" message and yet you're able to boot into the old kernel.
Have a look at your /boot/grub/menu.lst file (if you use "legacy" Grub ie v.0.97 or so); or, if you use Grub 2 (1.96 or 1.97) look in /boot/grub/grub.cfg. Make sure that the UUID shown corresponds to the partition you're trying to boot (sudo blkid will give you the UUIDs for all your partitions).
Try running update-grub - though this should happen automagically with the kernel update.
You can also replace theby /dev/sda5 (or whatever your partition is)./dev/disk/by-uuid/tra-lala
- 03-12-2010 #6Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 8,977
Although the drive UUID's should not change, it is possible. Also, don't use /dev/sda1, etc in /etc/fstab since they are likely to get renamed/renumbered. Preferable is to name the partitions and use LABEL=name in /etc/fstab. Example:
You can use the command /sbin/tune2fs -L name /dev/sdaN to relabel ext2/ext3 file systems. So, boot under the old kernel, relabel the file systems, edit /etc/fstab to use labels, and then try to boot the new kernel.Code:LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1 LABEL=/boot1 /boot ext3 defaults 1 2 LABEL=SWAP-sda2 swap swap defaults 0 0
Example to relabel your basic file systems on boot drive, assuming /dev/sda1 is /boot, /dev/sda2 is swap, and /dev/sda3 is / - use the command fdisk -l /dev/sda to see your configuration:
Code:sudo /sbin/tune2fs -L /boot1 /dev/sda1 sudo /sbin/tune2fs -L / /dev/sda3 sudo mkswap -L swap /dev/sda2
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 03-12-2010 #7Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 72
Well, yes, but:don't use /dev/sda1, etc in /etc/fstab since they are likely to get renamed/renumbered.
And ever since it happened to me, I can't see the point of using UUIDs at all.Although the drive UUID's should not change, it is possible.
Yes, I use labels. But if you are multibooting, labels such as / or /boot are not helpful. Personally, I use SDA1, SDA2 etc, so I know exactly which device they point to without having to run any commands, too. I don't know whether labels are more stable than UUIDs, but if they are no worse, then there's a case for suggesting that partitions be automatically labelled by default SDA1 or sda1 etc. Or even "dev/sda1" etc, which brings us round full circle.Preferable is to name the partitions and use LABEL=name in /etc/fstab
But this is getting us away from the OP's problem, which appears to be that there's a line in his grub.cfg or menu.lst which has the wrong UUID
- 03-12-2010 #8Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 163
thank you. I will hopefuly give this a try tonight and post back later.
- 03-13-2010 #9Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 163
sudo update-grub did not do much.
so i ran these commands and it told me the file did not exist.
file /dev/disk/by-uuid/e1768deb-95e0-44bd-96b0-b725c73d42af
I ran the update command and it told me there was an issue some of the openoffice sw and some other stuff.
sudo apt-get reinstall linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic gave an error..
The process told me to run this command....
sudo dpkg --configure -a
Once I did that I ran the update kernel command listed above and it said not needed or some such message.
I rebooted and things are working now.
So the problem looks like it was with openoffice and some java sw.
Sorry i dont have the actual errors I did not think to save them before the reboot.
Hope this helps someone else if they run into it.
- 03-24-2010 #10Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 163
apt-get install --reinstall linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic
this works now to see if it resolves my issue


Reply With Quote
