Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Hi, I am considering installing Linux on my workstation to develop and run fortran codes much faster than windows. I wonder if there is significant speed difference between Linux distros. ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    6

    Question Which Linux distro is faster?

    Hi,
    I am considering installing Linux on my workstation to develop and run fortran codes much faster than windows. I wonder if there is significant speed difference between Linux distros. Especially between Redhat and Ubuntu or Debian. I havent used any Linux distro longer enough to have an idea about its speed while running long codes.

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    88
    Far as I can tell, any can do... "harder-distros" as debian, Redhat are better. My xperience is that Ubuntu is a bit sluggish but only when running resource-demanding apps like gimp, some IDEs but it all depends mainly on your box, and what you are running at that particular instance.

    It's your choice!

  3. #3
    Linux Engineer nujinini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,230
    I find this to be quite fast. Darn, I how I wish I can set-up my own arch in one of my partitions!

    YouTube - How fast is Arch Linux?
    nujinini
    Linux User #489667

  4. #4
    oz
    oz is online now
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,099
    Quote Originally Posted by melian View Post
    I wonder if there is significant speed difference between Linux distros.
    Hello and welcome!

    Theoretically, they should all run about the same, but some distributions do start and run more services and apps than others by default, so some distros do feel faster than others. From my own experience, CRUX was the one that felt faster than any other that I've tried.
    oz

    new members/users: read this first | new member faq
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
    please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.

  5. #5
    Linux User hatebreed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    332
    I agree ozar, it's all about the services at startup. You can run a newer linux on an old setup if you just turn off some of the services that load on startup. In my small amount of experience, I found that in Ubuntu that the notification services that run on startup are pretty hungry. I have Opensuse and the same with that as well.

  6. #6
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Dover, NH
    Posts
    1,633
    The answer to this one depends on your computer's resources and what you're willing to do for setting it up.

    I find Slackware + IceWM to be quite speedy and not requiring a ton of setup, a nice balance especially for older systems. You can get lighter and faster with the likes of Arch, Crux, Gentoo... anything you build from the ground up since you decide exactly what's built and installed, the question becomes how much time you're willing to put into the assembly of your LEGO kit.

    Basically, I agree with Ozar, adding only that your hardware limits may have influence.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...