Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Hi everyone, I would like to know if it is normal to experience 10MB/s data transfer rates during copying between partitions on my local hard drives (Toshiba 250GB 5400rpm SATA) ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    23

    Ubuntu 10.04 64bit and hard disk transfer rate on a Toshiba Satellite P300-19F laptop

    Hi everyone,
    I would like to know if it is normal to experience 10MB/s data transfer rates during copying between partitions on my local hard drives (Toshiba 250GB 5400rpm SATA) while having three times faster (30MB/s) transfer rates between local partitions and USB drives (Kingston 8GB).

    Thank You all very much in advance.

    Stefano

  2. #2
    Linux Guru Rubberman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
    Posts
    8,977
    Sure. Why not? Copying between partitions on the same physical drive will definitely be slower than copying from drive to solid-state device. You have the latency introduced by the drive head seeking, rotational latency, and such. Also, how the target partition is mounted (with or without sync or async options) and how big the drive internal cache buffer is will affect this.

    In any case, 10 MBps seems slow (80mbps), as is 30 MBps (240mbps). What is the contents of your /etc/fstab with respect to the local drive partitions, and what file system(s) are you running on them?
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
    Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    23

    /etc/fstab

    Hi,
    the file system in my linux partition is ext2.
    here follows the content of my fstab. thanks for your time. stef

    # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
    #
    # Use 'blkid -o value -s UUID' to print the universally unique identifier
    # for a device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name
    # devices that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
    #
    # <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
    proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
    # / was on /dev/sda3 during installation
    UUID=cfad0950-0dbd-4002-85f4-7486cc97ab28 / ext2 errors=remount-ro 0 1
    # swap was on /dev/sda4 during installation
    UUID=0a13c40b-d5a6-4781-abf8-f204e4891c23 none swap sw 0 0

  4. #4
    Super Moderator devils casper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chandigarh, India
    Posts
    24,316
    Do you mount partition of internal Hard disk manually? None of internal partition except / and SWAP listed in /etc/fstab file.
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
    New Users: Read This First

  5. #5
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    23

    partition automatically mounted

    Everytime I boot Ubuntu I get my / automatically loaded. Isn't it correctly listed in the fstab? I can see:

    proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
    # / was on /dev/sda3 during installation
    UUID=cfad0950-0dbd-4002-85f4-7486cc97ab28 / ext2 errors=remount-ro 0 1
    # swap was on /dev/sda4 during installation
    UUID=0a13c40b-d5a6-4781-abf8-f204e4891c23 none swap sw 0 0

  6. #6
    Super Moderator devils casper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chandigarh, India
    Posts
    24,316
    I would like to know if it is normal to experience 10MB/s data transfer rates during copying between partitions on my local hard drives (Toshiba 250GB 5400rpm SATA)
    Only / partition is listed. There isn't any entry for other partitions. Do you have single partition in your Hard disk?
    Post the output of sudo fdisk -l command here.
    Code:
    sudo fdisk -l
    *Its small L in fdisk -l.
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
    New Users: Read This First

  7. #7
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    23

    result of the fdisk -l command

    I have two physical drives. One (sda) contains the ext2 linux partition (where / is mounted) and the swap partition.
    The other (sdb) contains a NTFS partition where I store data and documents.
    Here it follows what the fdisk -l command returns.
    Thanks!



    Disco /dev/sda: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 byte
    255 testine, 63 settori/tracce, 30401 cilindri
    Unità = cilindri di 16065 * 512 = 8225280 byte
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    Identificativo disco: 0xa9886bf0

    Dispositivo Boot Start End Blocks Id System
    /dev/sda3 1 29272 235127308+ 83 Linux
    /dev/sda4 29357 30401 8393962+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris

    Disco /dev/sdb: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 byte
    255 testine, 63 settori/tracce, 30401 cilindri
    Unità = cilindri di 16065 * 512 = 8225280 byte
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    Identificativo disco: 0x7d666819

    Dispositivo Boot Start End Blocks Id System
    /dev/sdb1 1 30401 244196001 7 HPFS/NTFS

  8. #8
    Super Moderator devils casper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chandigarh, India
    Posts
    24,316
    Create a mount point ( folder ) for NTFS Partition and edit /etc/fstab file.
    Code:
    sudo mkdir /media/data
    Add this code at the end of /etc/fstab file
    Code:
    /dev/sdb1     /media/data    ntfs-3g    defaults,umask=0   0   0
    Save file and execute sudo mount -a command.

    Check the speed of data transfer from and to /media/data (NTFS partition ) and Linux partition.
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
    New Users: Read This First

  9. #9
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    23

    no change

    I did what you suggested but I did not get any change

  10. #10
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    23

    update

    Hi, I have found that the copy-paste performed on the NTFS partition is carried out at much higher speed (30MB/s, 240 Mbit/s) than that charaterizing the same action performed on the ext2 partition (10MB/s, 80 Mbit/s). Thus, I think that the problem seems to be linked to the linux main partition.
    Do you have further suggestions?
    Thanks in advance

    Stefano

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...