Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
redcenly bought a new machine and i wanted to know if i should use 32 bti or 64 bit linux. This is a 64 bit Win 7 machine see the ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    10

    Should i uses 32-bit or 64 bit Ubuntu?

    redcenly bought a new machine and i wanted to know if i should use 32 bti or 64 bit linux. This is a 64 bit Win 7 machine see the specs below...

    Operating system
    Genuine Windows® 7 Professional 64-bit

    Windows 7
    Processor
    Intel® Core™ i3-550 Processor (3.20 GHz, 4 MB total cache)
    Chipset
    Intel® H57 Express
    Form factor
    Minitower
    Memory
    Standard memory
    4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 SDRAM
    Memory slots
    4 DIMM
    Storage
    Internal drive bays
    Two 3.5"
    External drive bays
    One 3.5"
    Two 5.25"
    Internal drive
    320 GB 7200 rpm SATA 3.0 Gb/s NCQ, Smart IV
    Optical drive
    16X SATA SuperMulti LightScribe DVD+/-RW
    Graphics
    Graphics
    Integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Core i5
    Expansion features
    Ports
    8 USB 2.0
    1 VGA
    1 DVI-D
    1 RJ-45
    1 SPDIF coaxial output
    1 audio in
    1 audio out
    1 microphone in
    (Select models have the following: 1 PS/2 keyboard; 1 PS/2 mouse; 1 serial)

    Slots
    1 full-height PCIe x16
    3 full-height PCIe x1
    1 mini PCI

    Any assistance would be appreciated

  2. #2
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,099
    Hello and welcome!

    I'd personally recommend running 64-bit. You can check this poll to see what others are running:

    http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/cof...ux-2011-a.html
    oz

    new members/users: read this first | new member faq
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
    please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.

  3. #3
    Linux Enthusiast Mudgen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    623
    Although I personally run 64 bit anywhere the cpu supports it, what you should do depends on your purpose. On the hardware you cite, 64 vs. 32 won't really make any significant performance difference, but there are some things that take some Googling and tweaking to make work in x86_64, so if out-of-the-box ease of use is paramount, 32 bit could be a better choice for you.

  4. #4
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Hrobakca View Post
    redcenly bought a new machine and i wanted to know if i should use 32 bti or 64 bit linux. This is a 64 bit Win 7 machine see the specs below...

    Operating system
    Genuine Windows® 7 Professional 64-bit

    Windows 7
    Processor
    Intel® Core™ i3-550 Processor (3.20 GHz, 4 MB total cache)
    Chipset
    Intel® H57 Express
    Form factor
    Minitower
    Memory
    Standard memory
    4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 SDRAM
    Memory slots
    4 DIMM
    Storage
    Internal drive bays
    Two 3.5"
    External drive bays
    One 3.5"
    Two 5.25"
    Internal drive
    320 GB 7200 rpm SATA 3.0 Gb/s NCQ, Smart IV
    Optical drive
    16X SATA SuperMulti LightScribe DVD+/-RW
    Graphics
    Graphics
    Integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Core i5
    Expansion features
    Ports
    8 USB 2.0
    1 VGA
    1 DVI-D
    1 RJ-45
    1 SPDIF coaxial output
    1 audio in
    1 audio out
    1 microphone in
    (Select models have the following: 1 PS/2 keyboard; 1 PS/2 mouse; 1 serial)

    Slots
    1 full-height PCIe x16
    3 full-height PCIe x1
    1 mini PCI

    Any assistance would be appreciated
    I looked at your specs and you are going to want to run 64 bit for one great and important reason... you have a mainboard capable of more than 4gig of RAM and with 32 bit you need to add a program to use 4 gig. instead of 3.5 gig. With 4 slots and DDR3 I'd bet you can supercharge with as much as 16 gig of memory.

    I'm still running 32 bit but my board is older than yours.

  5. #5
    Linux Newbie previso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    115
    64-bit video driver supportwould be my criteria. Otherwise, think of the possibilities of virtualization on a 64-bit platform. I wish mine was 64-bit.

  6. #6
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    11

    ditto on video driver

    ubuntu does not like my nvidia on an old hp touchsmart. i can live without throbbing icons, but the sometime full screen is irritatiing.

  7. #7
    Linux Enthusiast Mudgen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    623
    Quote Originally Posted by th1bill View Post
    I looked at your specs and you are going to want to run 64 bit for one great and important reason... you have a mainboard capable of more than 4gig of RAM and with 32 bit you need to add a program to use 4 gig. instead of 3.5 gig.
    Actually, all current 32-bit SMP and PAE kernels can use up to 64Gb. The per process limit is 4Gb.

  8. #8
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2
    well 64 bit will be faster, but besides that, there won't be any other reason to get it.
    I wouldn't recommend going the extra mile (or should I say extra 32 bits) until after you have tried the 32 bit linux

  9. #9
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Bolingbrook, IL
    Posts
    22

    32-bit works just fine

    I recently built a system similar to yours (identical, really, except for NVIDIA 7950GT video) as an upgrade to a Dell XPS-400 Pentium-D system. I decided on using Maverick 32-bit and I'm glad I did. The performance is head and shoulders above what I was using before. I'm only using 4GB memory and couldn't be happier with the performance so far.

  10. #10
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Corona, CA
    Posts
    29
    I'd try both, actually. If 64-bit works with your hardware, go with that. Unfortunately the ATI Radeon driver for 64-bit was buggy, and Adobe's flash didn't work well at all in 64-bit, so I went back to 32-bit. I'd recommend creating two root disks and one 'home' disk, where your data/files sits. You can then install 32-bit in one root disk and 64-bit in the other. Mount the 'home' disk regardless of which OS you boot into, so you can switch back and forth rather effortlessly.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...