Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15
Originally Posted by zmzach It says that it couldn't find gtk, not gtk+, which is weird. Code: sudo apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev is probably what you need then....
  1. #11
    Linux Guru antidrugue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    3,212
    Quote Originally Posted by zmzach
    It says that it couldn't find gtk, not gtk+, which is weird.
    Code:
    sudo apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev
    is probably what you need then.
    "To express yourself in freedom, you must die to everything of yesterday. From the 'old', you derive security; from the 'new', you gain the flow."

    -Bruce Lee

  2. #12
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    12
    zach@zach:~/Desktop/gtkpod-0.99.8$ sudo ./configure
    checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
    checking whether build environment is sane... yes
    checking for gawk... no
    checking for mawk... mawk
    checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
    checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
    checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
    checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
    checking for style of include used by make... GNU
    checking for gcc... gcc
    checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
    checking whether the C compiler works... yes
    checking whether we are cross compiling... no
    checking for suffix of executables...
    checking for suffix of object files... o
    checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
    checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
    checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
    checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
    checking for strerror in -lcposix... no
    checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
    checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
    checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
    checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed
    checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3
    checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
    checking for pkg-config... ok
    checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
    checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
    checking for PACKAGE... no
    configure: error: *** No package 'libglade-2.0' found
    Requested 'libgpod-1.0 >= 0.4.0' but version of libgpod is 0.3.2
    See `config.log' for more details.
    zach@zach:~/Desktop/gtkpod-0.99.8$ sudo more
    usage: more [-dflpcsu] [+linenum | +/pattern] name1 name2 ...
    Things have changed, but obviously not for the better. I installed libglade 2.0 with synaptic package monitor, but it still asks for it.

    And I'm not sure what to type for the command more.

    Thanks for sticking by me, I'm about to put a fist through my screen!

  3. #13
    Linux Guru bryansmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    /Ontario/Canada
    Posts
    2,621
    You also need libgpod >= 0.4.0 but you only have 0.3.2 installed.

    The more command will display the text file on your screen. So, more config.log will output config.log to your terminal window.

    Bryan
    Looking for a distro? Look here.
    "There can be no doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason)
    Queen's University - Arts and Science 2008 (Sociology)
    Registered Linux User #386147.

  4. #14
    Linux Engineer Thrillhouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arlington, VA, USA
    Posts
    1,377
    Does running
    $sudo apt-get upgrade
    give you the more current version of libgpod? or libglade? After that, try
    $which libgpod
    $which libglade

  5. #15
    Linux Guru antidrugue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    3,212
    Quote Originally Posted by zmzach
    Things have changed, but obviously not for the better. I installed libglade 2.0 with synaptic package monitor, but it still asks for it.
    Since you are compiling, whenever the compiler complains about something, it wants the development libraries for it.

    So "libglade2-dev" is what your want, as "libglade2-0" is of no use to the compiler (it doesn't contain header files).

    So
    Code:
    sudo apt-get libglade2-dev
    will take you one step further.
    "To express yourself in freedom, you must die to everything of yesterday. From the 'old', you derive security; from the 'new', you gain the flow."

    -Bruce Lee

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
...