Welcome to Linux Forums! With a comprehensive Linux Forum, information on various types of Linux software and many Linux Reviews articles, we have all the knowledge you need a click away, or accessible via our knowledgeable members.
Write an article for LinuxForums Today! Win Great Prizes!
Ok, I have read the last 5-6 pages on wireless cards with CentOS.
The consensus is that yes, this is mainly meant for server operations, which is why I need to know it since I hope to be doing this kind of work in the near future. So it makes sense that support for wireless cards, specifically PCI, is not high on the list.
The problem is that my wireless router is in another room which is also connected to the cable modem and phone, so it's not easy for me to bring everything over to my room. I'd like to try to get wireless working if possible. I know in a lot of threads, users ask for some info because other users need help getting their wireless card to work on CentOS!
My question is, I don't have a wireless card and I am ready to go out and buy WHATEVER vendor that is known to work for CentOS.
So here it goes, does anyone KNOW of any card that works out of the box? I will buy it immediately!!??
Also, I am not doing anything special at home, just WEP. No WMA or WMA2 or whatever the latest stuff is. Just the old school WEP.
Thanks!
PS: Worse case, I'd have to bring everything over into my room so I can just use the regular ETH0 lan card that's in the PC. But I'd like to try the wireless route if possible!?
I don't run CentOS. But I do know that Linux in general has good support for raylink and Atheros chips on Wireless G cards. So keep that in mind, i guess when looking for a card. I have had good luck with out of the box installs of Linux with this card I bought for my Desktop below. Hooked right up with no config. And it is cheap.
I don't run CentOS. But I do know that Linux in general has good support for raylink and Atheros chips on Wireless G cards. So keep that in mind, i guess when looking for a card. I have had good luck with out of the box installs of Linux with this card I bought for my Desktop below. Hooked right up with no config. And it is cheap.
I should mention that I have used this card successfully with
Puppy 4.2
AntiX 8.0 &8.2
Ubuntu (any animal)
Mint (Gnome and Fluxbox releases)
Over 300+ reviews!!
I am skimming through it trying to look for linux users. It does seem the card has problems with Vista 64-bit but that's not my problem nor will I be using it for Vista.
I hope it works for Redhat/CentOS/Scientific Linux distributions.
You can edit search at Newegg to just ive you Linux reviews.
Mine has a ralink chipset and uses the rt61 driver which is in most all linux kernels that I know of. The one I showed you should have a ralink chipset in it.
__________________ Free Linux Books
Linux Registered User # 475019 And I’ll keep using Linux until they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
You can edit search at Newegg to just ive you Linux reviews.
Mine has a ralink chipset and uses the rt61 driver which is in most all linux kernels that I know of. The one I showed you should have a ralink chipset in it.
CentOS 5.3 is using a 2.6.18 version kernel. That is the main problem when trying to install wifi drivers. Most can only be compiled on 2.6.22 or newer.
I have been able to compile the MadWifi driver on Red Hat 5.3, and that driver is for Atheros wireless chips.
Just be aware, you will most likely have to compile the driver from source. It isn't so hard, after you have done it a few times.
__________________
Paul
Please do not PM me with requests for help. I will not reply.
CentOS 5.3 is using a 2.6.18 version kernel. That is the main problem when trying to install wifi drivers. Most can only be compiled on 2.6.22 or newer.
I have been able to compile the MadWifi driver on Red Hat 5.3, and that driver is for Atheros wireless chips.
Just be aware, you will most likely have to compile the driver from source. It isn't so hard, after you have done it a few times.
The wireless card above seems to work for Fedora 8+, since CentOS 5.3 is more like Fedora 6, I probably will have to do some manual work which I really don't want to.
I am thinking about just d/l Fedora 11.
But I feel kind of dumb, when I went to a mirror for Fedora 11, I didn't see any ISO's to download?
Open Source Security Myths Dispelled Dispel the five major myths surrounding Open Source Security and gain the tools necessary to make a truly informed decision for your IT organization subscribe
InformationWeek InformationWeek is the only newsweekly you'll need to stay on top of the latest developments in information technology. subscribe